No.3 Super Glowing Essence Toner

Numbuzin

Toner
essence toner

Fact vs. Fiction

80 Very High Trustworthiness
How well the ingredient list supports the product's marketing claims
Marketing Claims Supported by Ingredients: 4 of 5
Ingredients Matched: 18 of 70
Delivers deep hydration and nourishment similar to an essence
Moderate Support
Supported by:
Glycerin
(Match: 0.67, Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Glycereth-26
(Match: 0.53, Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Butylene Glycol
(Match: 0.53, Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Sodium Hyaluronate
(Match: 0.53, Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Betaine
(Match: 0.53, Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
View Detailed Evidence
Glycerin
Functions: hydration, moisture retention
Glycereth-26
Functions: hydration
Butylene Glycol
Functions: hydration
Sodium Hyaluronate
Functions: hydration
Betaine
Functions: hydration
View Other Matched Ingredients (13)

The following ingredients were found in the product but don't provide strong enough evidence to support this specific claim:

Green Tea
Match score: 0.22 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester
Match score: 0.17 (Type: Peptide, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Niacinamide
Match score: 0.47 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactobacillus/Soybean Ferment Extract
Match score: 0.47 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactobacillus Ferment
Match score: 0.33 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactobacillus Ferment
Match score: 0.33 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactococcus Ferment Lysate
Match score: 0.33 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactococcus Ferment Lysate
Match score: 0.33 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Pseudoalteromonas Ferment Extract
Match score: 0.11 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Saccharomyces Ferment
Match score: 0.11 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Aspergillus Ferment
Match score: 0.11 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Cetearyl Alcohol
Match score: 0.27 (Type: Occlusive, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Adenosine
Match score: 0.22 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Helps to tighten and firm sagging skin, promoting a youthful appearance
Moderate Support
Supported by:
Niacinamide
(Match: 1.00, Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Adenosine
(Match: 0.80, Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Green Tea
(Match: 0.58, Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Lactobacillus/Soybean Ferment Extract
(Match: 0.51, Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Lactobacillus Ferment
(Match: 0.51, Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Lactobacillus Ferment
(Match: 0.51, Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Lactococcus Ferment Lysate
(Match: 0.51, Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Lactococcus Ferment Lysate
(Match: 0.51, Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Sodium Hyaluronate
(Match: 0.51, Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Cetearyl Alcohol
(Match: 0.51, Type: Occlusive, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Betaine
(Match: 0.51, Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
View Detailed Evidence
Niacinamide
Functions: anti-aging, brightening, melanin transfer inhibition
Concerns Addressed: fine lines, wrinkles, loss of firmness, elasticity loss, hyperpigmentation, uneven skin tone, dark spots, sun damage, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, acne, blemishes, breakouts, excess oil, inflammatory acne
Adenosine
Functions: anti-aging
Concerns Addressed: fine lines, wrinkles, loss of firmness, elasticity loss
Green Tea
Functions: soothing, antioxidant, free radical protection
Concerns Addressed: irritation, redness, sensitivity, inflammation
Lactobacillus/Soybean Ferment Extract
Lactobacillus Ferment
Lactobacillus Ferment
Lactococcus Ferment Lysate
Lactococcus Ferment Lysate
Sodium Hyaluronate
Functions: hydration
Cetearyl Alcohol
Functions: barrier protection
Betaine
Functions: hydration
View Other Matched Ingredients (7)

The following ingredients were found in the product but don't provide strong enough evidence to support this specific claim:

Glycereth-26
Match score: 0.36 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester
Match score: 0.36 (Type: Peptide, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Butylene Glycol
Match score: 0.36 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Glycerin
Match score: 0.36 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Pseudoalteromonas Ferment Extract
Match score: 0.24 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Saccharomyces Ferment
Match score: 0.24 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Aspergillus Ferment
Match score: 0.24 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Improves skin glow by 52.8%, and reduces pore size and sebum production
Unverified
View Other Matched Ingredients (18)

The following ingredients were found in the product but don't provide strong enough evidence to support this specific claim:

Green Tea
Match score: 0.12 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Glycereth-26
Match score: 0.12 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester
Match score: 0.12 (Type: Peptide, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Niacinamide
Match score: 0.36 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Butylene Glycol
Match score: 0.12 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Glycerin
Match score: 0.12 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactobacillus/Soybean Ferment Extract
Match score: 0.12 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactobacillus Ferment
Match score: 0.06 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactobacillus Ferment
Match score: 0.06 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactococcus Ferment Lysate
Match score: 0.06 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactococcus Ferment Lysate
Match score: 0.06 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Pseudoalteromonas Ferment Extract
Match score: 0.12 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Saccharomyces Ferment
Match score: 0.06 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Aspergillus Ferment
Match score: 0.06 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Sodium Hyaluronate
Match score: 0.12 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Cetearyl Alcohol
Match score: 0.12 (Type: Occlusive, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Betaine
Match score: 0.12 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Adenosine
Match score: 0.12 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Contains 50 types of fermented ingredients to boost skin elasticity, radiance, and texture
Moderate Support
Supported by:
Niacinamide
(Match: 0.68, Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
View Detailed Evidence
Niacinamide
Functions: anti-aging, brightening, melanin transfer inhibition
Concerns Addressed: fine lines, wrinkles, loss of firmness, elasticity loss, hyperpigmentation, uneven skin tone, dark spots, sun damage, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, acne, blemishes, breakouts, excess oil, inflammatory acne
View Other Matched Ingredients (17)

The following ingredients were found in the product but don't provide strong enough evidence to support this specific claim:

Green Tea
Match score: 0.10 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Glycereth-26
Match score: 0.15 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester
Match score: 0.31 (Type: Peptide, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Butylene Glycol
Match score: 0.15 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Glycerin
Match score: 0.15 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactobacillus/Soybean Ferment Extract
Match score: 0.37 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactobacillus Ferment
Match score: 0.37 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactobacillus Ferment
Match score: 0.37 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactococcus Ferment Lysate
Match score: 0.37 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactococcus Ferment Lysate
Match score: 0.37 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Pseudoalteromonas Ferment Extract
Match score: 0.15 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Saccharomyces Ferment
Match score: 0.15 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Aspergillus Ferment
Match score: 0.15 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Sodium Hyaluronate
Match score: 0.15 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Cetearyl Alcohol
Match score: 0.15 (Type: Occlusive, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Betaine
Match score: 0.15 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Adenosine
Match score: 0.31 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Non irritating and suitable for all skin types, enhancing natural strength and moisture retention for a luminous complexion
Moderate Support
Supported by:
Green Tea
(Match: 0.84, Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Niacinamide
(Match: 0.52, Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
View Detailed Evidence
Green Tea
Functions: soothing, antioxidant, free radical protection
Concerns Addressed: irritation, redness, sensitivity, inflammation
Niacinamide
Functions: anti-aging, brightening, melanin transfer inhibition
Concerns Addressed: fine lines, wrinkles, loss of firmness, elasticity loss, hyperpigmentation, uneven skin tone, dark spots, sun damage, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, acne, blemishes, breakouts, excess oil, inflammatory acne
View Other Matched Ingredients (16)

The following ingredients were found in the product but don't provide strong enough evidence to support this specific claim:

Glycereth-26
Match score: 0.32 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester
Match score: 0.28 (Type: Peptide, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Butylene Glycol
Match score: 0.32 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Glycerin
Match score: 0.48 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactobacillus/Soybean Ferment Extract
Match score: 0.32 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactobacillus Ferment
Match score: 0.24 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactobacillus Ferment
Match score: 0.24 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactococcus Ferment Lysate
Match score: 0.24 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactococcus Ferment Lysate
Match score: 0.24 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Pseudoalteromonas Ferment Extract
Match score: 0.32 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Saccharomyces Ferment
Match score: 0.24 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Aspergillus Ferment
Match score: 0.24 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Sodium Hyaluronate
Match score: 0.40 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Cetearyl Alcohol
Match score: 0.40 (Type: Occlusive, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Betaine
Match score: 0.40 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Adenosine
Match score: 0.44 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim

Ingredients