Sound Renewal

Superegg

Moisturizer
gel

Fact vs. Fiction

100 Very High Trustworthiness
How well the ingredient list supports the product's marketing claims
Marketing Claims Supported by Ingredients: 4 of 4
Ingredients Matched: 33 of 76
Collagen boosting peptides promote a more toned appearance and smoother looking skin
Moderate Support
Supported by:
Resveratrol
(Match: 0.60, Type: Antioxidant, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Centella Asiatica Extract
(Match: 0.55, Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
View Detailed Evidence
Resveratrol
Functions: Anti-Aging, Antioxidant, Cell Longevity Promoter, Anti-Inflammatory
Concerns Addressed: Fine Lines, Wrinkles, Dullness, Environmental Damage, Loss of Elasticity
Centella Asiatica Extract
Functions: soothing, redness reduction, wound healing
Concerns Addressed: irritation, redness, sensitivity, inflammation, compromised barrier, weakened skin
View Other Matched Ingredients (31)

The following ingredients were found in the product but don't provide strong enough evidence to support this specific claim:

Glycerin
Match score: 0.25 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Ethylhexyl Stearate
Match score: 0.35 (Type: Occlusive, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester
Match score: 0.30 (Type: Peptide, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Diisostearyl Malate
Match score: 0.35 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Cetearyl Alcohol
Match score: 0.35 (Type: Occlusive, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Panthenol
Match score: 0.35 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Egcg
Match score: 0.13 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract
Match score: 0.25 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Squalane
Match score: 0.35 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7
Match score: 0.30 (Type: Peptide, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Copper Tripeptide-1
Match score: 0.20 (Type: Peptide, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Sodium Hyaluronate
Match score: 0.35 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Hyaluronic Acid
Match score: 0.45 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Madecassoside
Match score: 0.45 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.25 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.25 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.25 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Hyaluronic Acid
Match score: 0.45 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Ginseng
Match score: 0.35 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Gluconolactone
Match score: 0.30 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Ceramides
Match score: 0.25 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Tocopherol
Match score: 0.50 (Type: Antioxidant, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Adenosine
Match score: 0.45 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Beta-Glucan
Match score: 0.35 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Houttuynia Cordata Extract
Match score: 0.35 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Polyglutamic Acid
Match score: 0.45 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Green Tea
Match score: 0.45 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Citric Acid
Match score: 0.17 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Pentylene Glycol
Match score: 0.25 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Caprylyl Glycol
Match score: 0.35 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Butylene Glycol
Match score: 0.25 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Panthenol (ProVitamin B5), Squalane, and Essential Fatty Acids improve moisture retention in the skin to prevent transepidermal water loss and help boost skin barrier function
Moderate Support
Supported by:
Tocopherol
(Match: 0.56, Type: Antioxidant, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Resveratrol
(Match: 0.52, Type: Antioxidant, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
View Detailed Evidence
Tocopherol
Functions: Antioxidant, Moisturizing, Skin Protecting, Healing
Concerns Addressed: Environmental Damage, Dryness, Rough Texture, Minor Wounds, Scars
Resveratrol
Functions: Anti-Aging, Antioxidant, Cell Longevity Promoter, Anti-Inflammatory
Concerns Addressed: Fine Lines, Wrinkles, Dullness, Environmental Damage, Loss of Elasticity
View Other Matched Ingredients (31)

The following ingredients were found in the product but don't provide strong enough evidence to support this specific claim:

Glycerin
Match score: 0.45 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Ethylhexyl Stearate
Match score: 0.31 (Type: Occlusive, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester
Match score: 0.24 (Type: Peptide, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Diisostearyl Malate
Match score: 0.14 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Cetearyl Alcohol
Match score: 0.31 (Type: Occlusive, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Panthenol
Match score: 0.38 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Egcg
Match score: 0.14 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract
Match score: 0.21 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Squalane
Match score: 0.14 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7
Match score: 0.31 (Type: Peptide, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Copper Tripeptide-1
Match score: 0.24 (Type: Peptide, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Sodium Hyaluronate
Match score: 0.21 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Hyaluronic Acid
Match score: 0.45 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella Asiatica Extract
Match score: 0.42 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Madecassoside
Match score: 0.42 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.14 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.14 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.14 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Hyaluronic Acid
Match score: 0.45 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Ginseng
Match score: 0.45 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Gluconolactone
Match score: 0.21 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Ceramides
Match score: 0.28 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Adenosine
Match score: 0.45 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Beta-Glucan
Match score: 0.21 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Houttuynia Cordata Extract
Match score: 0.28 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Polyglutamic Acid
Match score: 0.28 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Green Tea
Match score: 0.28 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Citric Acid
Match score: 0.09 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Pentylene Glycol
Match score: 0.21 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Caprylyl Glycol
Match score: 0.14 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Butylene Glycol
Match score: 0.21 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Snow Mushroom and three molecular weights of Hyaluronic Acid provide weightless hydration on varying skin depths, while PHA gently exfoliates to reveal a brighter, youthful look
Moderate Support
Supported by:
Hyaluronic Acid
(Match: 0.86, Type: Humectant, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Hyaluronic Acid
(Match: 0.86, Type: Humectant, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Polyglutamic Acid
(Match: 0.69, Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Resveratrol
(Match: 0.58, Type: Antioxidant, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
View Detailed Evidence
Hyaluronic Acid
Functions: hydration, deep hydration, water binding
Concerns Addressed: dryness, dehydration, flakiness
Functions: hydration, deep hydration, water binding
Concerns Addressed: dryness, dehydration, flakiness
Hyaluronic Acid
Functions: hydration, deep hydration, water binding
Concerns Addressed: dryness, dehydration, flakiness
Functions: hydration, deep hydration, water binding
Concerns Addressed: dryness, dehydration, flakiness
Polyglutamic Acid
Functions: hydration
Concerns Addressed: dryness, dehydration, flakiness
Resveratrol
Functions: Anti-Aging, Antioxidant, Cell Longevity Promoter, Anti-Inflammatory
Concerns Addressed: Fine Lines, Wrinkles, Dullness, Environmental Damage, Loss of Elasticity
View Other Matched Ingredients (29)

The following ingredients were found in the product but don't provide strong enough evidence to support this specific claim:

Glycerin
Match score: 0.44 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Ethylhexyl Stearate
Match score: 0.36 (Type: Occlusive, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester
Match score: 0.25 (Type: Peptide, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Diisostearyl Malate
Match score: 0.33 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Cetearyl Alcohol
Match score: 0.36 (Type: Occlusive, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Panthenol
Match score: 0.44 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Egcg
Match score: 0.14 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract
Match score: 0.22 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Squalane
Match score: 0.33 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7
Match score: 0.30 (Type: Peptide, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Copper Tripeptide-1
Match score: 0.19 (Type: Peptide, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Sodium Hyaluronate
Match score: 0.50 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella Asiatica Extract
Match score: 0.50 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Madecassoside
Match score: 0.36 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.19 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.19 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.19 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Ginseng
Match score: 0.33 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Gluconolactone
Match score: 0.41 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Ceramides
Match score: 0.25 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Tocopherol
Match score: 0.50 (Type: Antioxidant, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Adenosine
Match score: 0.39 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Beta-Glucan
Match score: 0.44 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Houttuynia Cordata Extract
Match score: 0.33 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Green Tea
Match score: 0.41 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Citric Acid
Match score: 0.25 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Pentylene Glycol
Match score: 0.39 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Caprylyl Glycol
Match score: 0.33 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Butylene Glycol
Match score: 0.39 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Helichrysum Italicum Flower Water, Green Tea EGCG, and Centella Asiatica actives soothe sensitized skin and work to defend against environmental factors such as sun damage and pollution
Minimal Support
Supported by:
Centella Asiatica Extract
(Match: 0.69, Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
View Detailed Evidence
Centella Asiatica Extract
Functions: soothing, redness reduction, wound healing
Concerns Addressed: irritation, redness, sensitivity, inflammation, compromised barrier, weakened skin
View Other Matched Ingredients (32)

The following ingredients were found in the product but don't provide strong enough evidence to support this specific claim:

Glycerin
Match score: 0.07 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Ethylhexyl Stearate
Match score: 0.17 (Type: Occlusive, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester
Match score: 0.11 (Type: Peptide, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Diisostearyl Malate
Match score: 0.14 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Cetearyl Alcohol
Match score: 0.17 (Type: Occlusive, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Panthenol
Match score: 0.07 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Egcg
Match score: 0.05 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract
Match score: 0.07 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Squalane
Match score: 0.05 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Palmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7
Match score: 0.17 (Type: Peptide, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Copper Tripeptide-1
Match score: 0.11 (Type: Peptide, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Sodium Hyaluronate
Match score: 0.07 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Hyaluronic Acid
Match score: 0.11 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Madecassoside
Match score: 0.44 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.14 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.14 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.14 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Hyaluronic Acid
Match score: 0.11 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Ginseng
Match score: 0.09 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Gluconolactone
Match score: 0.09 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Ceramides
Match score: 0.05 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Resveratrol
Match score: 0.47 (Type: Antioxidant, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Tocopherol
Match score: 0.50 (Type: Antioxidant, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Adenosine
Match score: 0.09 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Beta-Glucan
Match score: 0.07 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Houttuynia Cordata Extract
Match score: 0.33 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Polyglutamic Acid
Match score: 0.07 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Green Tea
Match score: 0.47 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Citric Acid
Match score: 0.02 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Pentylene Glycol
Match score: 0.07 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Caprylyl Glycol
Match score: 0.05 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Butylene Glycol
Match score: 0.07 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim

Ingredients

Sound Renewal