Kind Atmosphere
Superegg
Toner
mist
Fact vs. Fiction
75
High
Trustworthiness
How well the ingredient list supports the product's marketing claims
Marketing Claims Supported by Ingredients:
3 of 4
Ingredients Matched:
24 of 67
Enhance the appearance of plump and firm skin with Hyaluronic Acid, Palmitoyl Tripeptide5, and Palmitoyl Hexapeptide12
Moderate Support
Supported by:
Niacinamide
(Match: 0.63,
Type: Active Ingredient,
Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Adenosine
(Match: 0.51,
Type: Active Ingredient,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
View Detailed Evidence
Niacinamide
Functions:
anti-aging, brightening, melanin transfer inhibition
Concerns Addressed:
fine lines, wrinkles, loss of firmness, elasticity loss, hyperpigmentation, uneven skin tone, dark spots, sun damage, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, acne, blemishes, breakouts, excess oil, inflammatory acne
Adenosine
Functions:
anti-aging
Concerns Addressed:
fine lines, wrinkles, loss of firmness, elasticity loss
View Other Matched Ingredients (22)
The following ingredients were found in the product but don't provide strong enough evidence to support this specific claim:
Glycerin
Match score: 0.14
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Butylene Glycol
Match score: 0.14
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester
Match score: 0.23
(Type: Peptide,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Bifida Ferment Lysate
Match score: 0.23
(Type: fermented,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella Asiatica Extract
Match score: 0.34
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Madecassoside
Match score: 0.29
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.14
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.14
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Nymphaea Alba Flower Extract
Match score: 0.23
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Egcg
Match score: 0.14
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract
Match score: 0.23
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Mugwort
Match score: 0.14
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Hyaluronic Acid
Match score: 0.40
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Pseudoalteromonas Ferment Extract
Match score: 0.23
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Licorice Derivative
Match score: 0.14
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Beta-Glucan
Match score: 0.14
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Allantoin
Match score: 0.14
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Tocopherol
Match score: 0.40
(Type: Antioxidant,
Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Caffeine
Match score: 0.34
(Type: Active Ingredient,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Polyglutamic Acid
Match score: 0.14
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Citric Acid
Match score: 0.10
(Type: Active Ingredient,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Caprylyl Glycol
Match score: 0.23
(Type: Emollient,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Soothing actives Centella Asiatica and White Water Lily help reduce signs of skin sensitivity and irritation for calm, even toned skin
Moderate Support
Supported by:
Centella Asiatica Extract
★
(Match: 0.83,
Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Madecassoside
(Match: 0.54,
Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
View Detailed Evidence
Centella Asiatica Extract
Functions:
soothing, redness reduction, wound healing
Concerns Addressed:
irritation, redness, sensitivity, inflammation, compromised barrier, weakened skin
Madecassoside
Functions:
soothing
Concerns Addressed:
irritation, redness, sensitivity, inflammation, compromised barrier, weakened skin
View Other Matched Ingredients (22)
The following ingredients were found in the product but don't provide strong enough evidence to support this specific claim:
Glycerin
Match score: 0.05
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Butylene Glycol
Match score: 0.08
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester
Match score: 0.13
(Type: Peptide,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Bifida Ferment Lysate
Match score: 0.08
(Type: fermented,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.19
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.19
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Nymphaea Alba Flower Extract
Match score: 0.13
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Egcg
Match score: 0.08
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract
Match score: 0.13
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Mugwort
Match score: 0.48
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Hyaluronic Acid
Match score: 0.22
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Niacinamide
Match score: 0.48
(Type: Active Ingredient,
Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Pseudoalteromonas Ferment Extract
Match score: 0.13
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Licorice Derivative
Match score: 0.08
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Beta-Glucan
Match score: 0.08
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Adenosine
Match score: 0.19
(Type: Active Ingredient,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Allantoin
Match score: 0.48
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Tocopherol
Match score: 0.22
(Type: Antioxidant,
Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Caffeine
Match score: 0.22
(Type: Active Ingredient,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Polyglutamic Acid
Match score: 0.08
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Citric Acid
Match score: 0.05
(Type: Active Ingredient,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Caprylyl Glycol
Match score: 0.13
(Type: Emollient,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Niacinamide and Green Tea brighten, reduce the look of enlarged pores, and offer daily protection against UV and free radical damage to fight visible signs of aging
Moderate Support
Supported by:
Niacinamide
(Match: 0.75,
Type: Active Ingredient,
Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
View Detailed Evidence
Niacinamide
Functions:
anti-aging, brightening, melanin transfer inhibition
Concerns Addressed:
fine lines, wrinkles, loss of firmness, elasticity loss, hyperpigmentation, uneven skin tone, dark spots, sun damage, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, acne, blemishes, breakouts, excess oil, inflammatory acne
View Other Matched Ingredients (23)
The following ingredients were found in the product but don't provide strong enough evidence to support this specific claim:
Glycerin
Match score: 0.06
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Butylene Glycol
Match score: 0.06
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester
Match score: 0.10
(Type: Peptide,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Bifida Ferment Lysate
Match score: 0.06
(Type: fermented,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella Asiatica Extract
Match score: 0.06
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Madecassoside
Match score: 0.04
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.04
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.04
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Nymphaea Alba Flower Extract
Match score: 0.06
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Egcg
Match score: 0.04
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract
Match score: 0.06
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Mugwort
Match score: 0.04
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Hyaluronic Acid
Match score: 0.10
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Pseudoalteromonas Ferment Extract
Match score: 0.06
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Licorice Derivative
Match score: 0.04
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Beta-Glucan
Match score: 0.06
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Adenosine
Match score: 0.43
(Type: Active Ingredient,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Allantoin
Match score: 0.13
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Tocopherol
Match score: 0.35
(Type: Antioxidant,
Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Caffeine
Match score: 0.32
(Type: Active Ingredient,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Polyglutamic Acid
Match score: 0.06
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Citric Acid
Match score: 0.04
(Type: Active Ingredient,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Caprylyl Glycol
Match score: 0.06
(Type: Emollient,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Cicaria™, Bifida Ferment Lysate, and Saccharomyces Ferment Filtrate work towards barrier support to strengthen the skin's immune system and improve the health of the skin microbiome
Unverified
View Other Matched Ingredients (24)
The following ingredients were found in the product but don't provide strong enough evidence to support this specific claim:
Glycerin
Match score: 0.15
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Butylene Glycol
Match score: 0.15
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester
Match score: 0.18
(Type: Peptide,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Bifida Ferment Lysate
Match score: 0.33
(Type: fermented,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella Asiatica Extract
Match score: 0.33
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Madecassoside
Match score: 0.25
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.09
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.09
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Nymphaea Alba Flower Extract
Match score: 0.18
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Egcg
Match score: 0.09
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract
Match score: 0.18
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Mugwort
Match score: 0.09
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Hyaluronic Acid
Match score: 0.18
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Niacinamide
Match score: 0.40
(Type: Active Ingredient,
Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Pseudoalteromonas Ferment Extract
Match score: 0.25
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Licorice Derivative
Match score: 0.09
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Beta-Glucan
Match score: 0.15
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Adenosine
Match score: 0.22
(Type: Active Ingredient,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Allantoin
Match score: 0.22
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Tocopherol
Match score: 0.47
(Type: Antioxidant,
Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Caffeine
Match score: 0.25
(Type: Active Ingredient,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Polyglutamic Acid
Match score: 0.15
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Citric Acid
Match score: 0.06
(Type: Active Ingredient,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Caprylyl Glycol
Match score: 0.15
(Type: Emollient,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Ingredients
- Water/\u200bAqua/\u200bEau
- Glycerin
- Butylene Glycol
- Staphylococcus Epidermidis Ferment Filtrate
- 1
- 2-Hexanediol
- Methylpropanediol
- Saccharomyces Ferment Filtrate
- Bifida Ferment Lysate
- Centella Asiatica Extract
- Madecassoside
- Asiaticoside
- Centella Asiatica Leaf Extract
- Nymphaea Alba Flower Extract
- Epigallocatechin Gallate
- Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract
- Artemisia Vulgaris Extract
- Palmitoyl Hexapeptide-12
- Hydrolyzed Hyaluronic Acid
- Crithmum Maritimum Callus Culture Filtrate
- Niacinamide
- Opuntia Ficus-Indica Seed Oil
- Portulaca Oleracea Extract
- Tetradecyl Aminobutyroylvalylaminobutyric Urea Trifluoroacetate
- Pseudoalteromonas Ferment Extract
- Dipotassium Glycyrrhizate
- Beta-Glucan
- Adenosine
- Cynanchum Atratum Extract
- Lupinus Albus Seed Extract
- Melia Azadirachta Flower Extract
- Melia Azadirachta Leaf Extract
- Althaea Rosea Flower Extract
- Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seed Oil
- Allantoin
- Tocopherol
- Caffeine
- Diamond Powder
- Biotin
- Glycine
- Proline
- Serine
- Glutamic Acid
- Aspartic Acid
- Leucine
- Alanine
- Lysine
- Arginine
- Tyrosine
- Phenylalanine
- Threonine
- Valine
- Isoleucine
- Histidine
- Cysteine
- Methionine
- Sodium Palmitoyl Proline
- Citric Acid
- Sodium Citrate
- Triethyl Citrate
- Trisodium Ethylenediamine Disuccinate
- Magnesium Chloride
- Ethylhexylglycerin
- Polyglyceryl-10 Laurate
- Hydroxyacetophenone
- Caprylyl Glycol
- Dipropylene Glycol
