Apricot Blossom Peeling Gel
Beauty of Joseon
Exfoliant
Fact vs. Fiction
33
Low
Trustworthiness
How well the ingredient list supports the product's marketing claims
Marketing Claims Supported by Ingredients:
1 of 3
Ingredients Matched:
9 of 20
This product minimizes skin discomfort with its gommage texture
Unverified
View Other Matched Ingredients (9)
The following ingredients were found in the product but don't provide strong enough evidence to support this specific claim:
Green Tea
Match score: 0.15
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester
Match score: 0.07
(Type: Peptide,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Allantoin
Match score: 0.15
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Sorbitol
Match score: 0.15
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract
Match score: 0.15
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Houttuynia Cordata Extract
Match score: 0.15
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lotus Flower Extract
Match score: 0.15
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Rice Extract
Match score: 0.30
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Butylene Glycol
Match score: 0.15
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
This is a gommage type exfoliator, enriched with 19% Prunus Mume Flower Water and 8% plant
Unverified
View Other Matched Ingredients (9)
The following ingredients were found in the product but don't provide strong enough evidence to support this specific claim:
Green Tea
Match score: 0.50
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester
Match score: 0.25
(Type: Peptide,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Allantoin
Match score: 0.40
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Sorbitol
Match score: 0.25
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract
Match score: 0.40
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Houttuynia Cordata Extract
Match score: 0.40
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lotus Flower Extract
Match score: 0.45
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Rice Extract
Match score: 0.40
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Butylene Glycol
Match score: 0.25
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
based Cellulose. It aims to alleviate skin concerns linked to uneven texture and excessive sebum production
Minimal Support
Supported by:
Rice Extract
(Match: 0.64,
Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
View Detailed Evidence
Rice Extract
Functions:
brightening
Concerns Addressed:
hyperpigmentation, uneven skin tone, dark spots, sun damage, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation
View Other Matched Ingredients (8)
The following ingredients were found in the product but don't provide strong enough evidence to support this specific claim:
Green Tea
Match score: 0.32
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Acetyl Dipeptide-1 Cetyl Ester
Match score: 0.21
(Type: Peptide,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Allantoin
Match score: 0.48
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Sorbitol
Match score: 0.43
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract
Match score: 0.13
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Houttuynia Cordata Extract
Match score: 0.32
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lotus Flower Extract
Match score: 0.13
(Type: Botanical Extract,
Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Butylene Glycol
Match score: 0.21
(Type: Humectant,
Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Ingredients
- Water
- Prunus Mume Flower Water
- Cellulose
- Propanediol
- 1
- 2-Hexanediol
- Carbomer
- Arginine
- Ethylhexylglycerin
- Allantoin
- Sorbitol
- Disodium EDTA
- Pyrus Malus Fruit Extract
- Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract
- Houttuynia Cordata Extract
- Nelumbo Nucifera Flower Extract
- Oryza Sativa Extract
- Prunus Mume Fruit Extract
- Vaccinium Angustifolium Fruit Extract
- Butylene Glycol
