Multi Nutrient & Dioic Renewing Cream

ALLIES OF SKIN

Moisturizer
cream

Fact vs. Fiction

100 Very High Trustworthiness
How well the ingredient list supports the product's marketing claims
Marketing Claims Supported by Ingredients: 2 of 2
Ingredients Matched: 23 of 58
Balances & hydrates breakout prone skin, reduces redness, evens skin tone.
Minimal Support
Supported by:
Niacinamide
(Match: 0.51, Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
View Detailed Evidence
Niacinamide
Functions: anti-aging, brightening, melanin transfer inhibition
Concerns Addressed: fine lines, wrinkles, loss of firmness, elasticity loss, hyperpigmentation, uneven skin tone, dark spots, sun damage, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, acne, blemishes, breakouts, excess oil, inflammatory acne
View Other Matched Ingredients (22)

The following ingredients were found in the product but don't provide strong enough evidence to support this specific claim:

Green Tea
Match score: 0.09 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Glycerin
Match score: 0.25 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
Match score: 0.03 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactobacillus Ferment
Match score: 0.00 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.03 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Rosa Canina Fruit Oil
Match score: 0.03 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Squalane
Match score: 0.03 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Calophyllum Inophyllum Seed Oil
Match score: 0.03 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Simmondsia Chinensis Seed Oil
Match score: 0.03 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Glycyrrhiza Glabra Root Extract
Match score: 0.03 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Honey
Match score: 0.18 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Zinc
Match score: 0.03 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Caffeine
Match score: 0.06 (Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Allantoin
Match score: 0.09 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.03 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Sodium Hyaluronate
Match score: 0.18 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Bisabolol
Match score: 0.12 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Ceramides
Match score: 0.06 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Hyaluronic Acid
Match score: 0.25 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Caprylyl Glycol
Match score: 0.03 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Isohexadecane
Match score: 0.03 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Butylene Glycol
Match score: 0.18 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
It balances oily skin and evens the appearance of redness and irregularities while providing moisture and clarity.
Moderate Support
Supported by:
Niacinamide
(Match: 0.69, Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Bisabolol
(Match: 0.59, Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Caffeine
(Match: 0.53, Type: Active Ingredient, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
View Detailed Evidence
Niacinamide
Functions: anti-aging, brightening, melanin transfer inhibition
Concerns Addressed: fine lines, wrinkles, loss of firmness, elasticity loss, hyperpigmentation, uneven skin tone, dark spots, sun damage, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, acne, blemishes, breakouts, excess oil, inflammatory acne
Bisabolol
Functions: Soothing, Anti-Inflammatory, Penetration Enhancing, Antimicrobial
Concerns Addressed: Redness, Irritation, Sensitivity, Inflammation, Sunburn, Minor Wounds
Caffeine
Functions: Vasoconstricting, Antioxidant, Lipolytic, Protective
Concerns Addressed: Puffiness, Dark Circles, Cellulite, Sagging, UV Damage, Redness
View Other Matched Ingredients (20)

The following ingredients were found in the product but don't provide strong enough evidence to support this specific claim:

Green Tea
Match score: 0.48 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Glycerin
Match score: 0.37 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
Match score: 0.27 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Lactobacillus Ferment
Match score: 0.21 (Type: fermented, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.21 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Rosa Canina Fruit Oil
Match score: 0.37 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Squalane
Match score: 0.27 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Calophyllum Inophyllum Seed Oil
Match score: 0.21 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Simmondsia Chinensis Seed Oil
Match score: 0.21 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Glycyrrhiza Glabra Root Extract
Match score: 0.27 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Low - Anecdotal evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Honey
Match score: 0.27 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Zinc
Match score: 0.21 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Allantoin
Match score: 0.48 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Centella
Match score: 0.21 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Sodium Hyaluronate
Match score: 0.27 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Ceramides
Match score: 0.32 (Type: Botanical Extract, Evidence: Medium - Limited clinical evidence)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Hyaluronic Acid
Match score: 0.32 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: High - Multiple clinical trials)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Caprylyl Glycol
Match score: 0.27 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Isohexadecane
Match score: 0.27 (Type: Emollient, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim
Butylene Glycol
Match score: 0.27 (Type: Humectant, Evidence: Theoretical - Based on mechanism only)
Insufficient evidence for supporting this claim

Ingredients

Multi Nutrient & Dioic Renewing Cream